Iââ¬â¢m trying to figure out why I love this movie so much. I saw it with my brother last summer, rented the DVD last month, and bought the thing last night.
Mary Cummings is a good Christian girl in a tight-knight, born-again suburban community somewhere warm enough that everyone has a swimming pool and the leaves never fall off the trees. She has a fluffy pink room and a fluffy pink life, khaki school uniforms and an uncious Christian girl band.
When her boyfriend confides that he is gay, she courageously surrenders her maidenhead to save him from his fate (itââ¬â¢s what Jesus would do), only to see him sent away to a religious reform school for the rest of the year.
A month or two later, she learns she is pregnant, which leads her to question everything she believes in. She eventually finds new faith in her formerly self-absorbed mother, a couple of raucous high-school outcasts (ââ¬ÅDonââ¬â¢t you have a church to desecrate or something?ââ¬Â), and the ministerââ¬â¢s perfect son (ââ¬ÅMost of the boys at our school look like NASA employees. Not Patrick!ââ¬Â).
So why canââ¬â¢t let go of this film? It could certainly be the stunning screenplay:
Roland: Is that Mary? What is she doing downtown?
Cassandra: Thereââ¬â¢s only one reason a good Christian girl goes to the Planned Parenthood.
Roland: Sheââ¬â¢s planting a pipe bomb?!
And then there is the acting. Macaulay Culkin alone, as the pitilessly cynical paraplegic horn dog (ââ¬ÅSheââ¬â¢s going to show her boobs! Thank you, Jesus!ââ¬Â) justifies the movie.
Possibly itââ¬â¢s because Iââ¬â¢ve had two friends exactly like the sweetly vicious, domineering and hypocritical Hilary Faye (ââ¬ÅShe actually tried to exorcise you? That was nice of her, I guess.ââ¬Â)
Or maybe itââ¬â¢s the frothy sweet romance between Mary and Patrick. Itââ¬â¢s wonderful to imagine that no matter how messed up your life is, a soul mate with floppy hair will notice that youââ¬â¢re managing with grace and courage.
Itââ¬â¢s also appealing that the film is about a close community of imperfect people. Theyââ¬â¢ve known each other long enough and well enough that, while they donââ¬â¢t necessarily like each other, they do love each other. Possibly Iââ¬â¢m homesick, having few such keepers in Cambridge.
But I think itââ¬â¢s the laser fine, sharp but painlessly delivered theme that carries the day. The characters in Saved! are imperfect, often shallow and sometimes ridiculous (ââ¬ÅSo, like, which country has the worst heathens?ââ¬Â). But the film manages to condemn hypocrisy without creating villains. In Christian fashion, it hates the sin and not the sinner, allowing the viewer to imagine the cameraââ¬â¢s unflinching lens turned on him or herself.
Posted by Marie Gryphon on November 28, 2004Interesting. I saw this movie recently and while there were some clever lines (the pipe bomb line is the one real takeaway classic) I was disappointed by the too-pat, secularist ending. It seemed to me that the evangelical perspective wasn't really taken or presented seriously by the filmmakers. The movie wasn't serious enough to be an effective attack on conservative Christianity, nor was it biting enough to be a truly effective satire. The filmmakers could have gone in the direction of a film like "Citizen Ruth," which pointed out how the secular humanist left has its own set of ridiculous shibboleths. But this movie wasn't smart enough for that.
"Saved!" wasn't terrible. It wasn't offensively bad. But it wasn't very good. And I certainly wouldn't name it a favorite. Just my two cents, of course.
Posted by: Kevin B. O'Reilly on November 28, 2004 11:35 PMWhy Kevin, what are you doing here? I don't blog enough to get company! Just give me a minute to tidy up...
Good points, all. Saved! is surely not great filmaking, though I do think it is a good movie. Which is the reason for the question posed in the post: If I'd seen Chariots of Fire three times in the last six months, I wouldn't be wondering why. While it's not as embarrasing as, say, an addiction to St. Elmo's Fire would be, it is worthy of a bit of an inquiry.
Posted by: Marie on November 29, 2004 9:01 AMHave you seen Pumpkin yet?
Posted by: Keelay on November 29, 2004 3:26 PMNope.
Posted by: Marie on November 30, 2004 10:59 PMInfrequent Blogger Melody
Oh, my blog, my blogger,
I've hungered for your blog a long,
lonely time. Time goes by so slowly
and time can do so much.
Are you still blogging?
I need your blog.
I need your blog.
God speed your blog to me.
Lonely bloggers flow to the sea, to the sea,
to the open arms of the sea.
Lonely bloggers sigh, wait for me,
wait for me.
I'll be blogging soon, wait for me.
Oh, my blog, my blogger,
I've hungered for your blog a long
lonely time. Time, goes by so slowly,
and time can do so much,
Are you still blogging?
I need your blog.
I need your blog.
God speed your blog, to me.