On the heels of the Masters, Julian Sanchez bravely takes one last poke at the hopelessly overanalyzed Augusta membership row. Not only should Augustaâs choice to exclude women from membership be legal, he argues, but itâs really pretty unobjectionable given that both genders find it more relaxing to occasionally retreat to single sex environments. Women tend to indulge this desire more than men, he points out.
He concludes quixotically that - despite the foregoing - he âwouldnât join a club like Augusta,â but fails to explain why he would not.
I think I might know why.
Augustaâs choice to accept only male members should absolutely be legal. Julian and I agree on this much. We also agree that thereâs nothing wrong with a male bowling club, or a ladies-only supper club. Or even an all male golf club, for that matter.
The problem with Augusta is that it has become â mostly by virtue of the Masters â the pinnacle of the American golf world. It is a best-of-kind institution, and its choices have a large cultural impact on the whole sport. Accordingly, its reasons for excluding women from its membership are culturally, though not politically, important.
Even if Julian is correct that Augustaâs rule is motivated by the same harmless desire to dress badly and make obnoxious jokes that inspires other single sex social organizations, an absolutely top notch organization â one that stands for something large and aspirational â is not a classy place to exclude members in order to satisfy that need. Julian points to single sex colleges. Well and good. But if Harvard were still single sex, weâd hear about it, and rightly so.
But contrary to Julianâs suggestion, I donât think Augustaâs membership rules have much to do with wanting to sneak away for a round or two in an all male environment. As Augusta representatives themselves endlessly point out: Women can play at Augusta! They also populate the clubhouse at lunches and dinners. Theyâre all over the place. They just arenât allowed a voice in running the organization, or the status associated with membership.
That reality makes Augustaâs male-only rule a statement without substance. It accords status, and little else, unequally between genders. It is an assertion that running this best of breed golf club is still menâs business.
If I were a man, I wouldnât join that club either.
Posted by Marie Gryphon on April 16, 2003Trust me, Marie. If you were a man, you'd hate women. Keeping them out of your club would be just the beginning.
Posted by: Kyle on April 17, 2003 2:08 PMNonsense, Kyle. If I were a man I would be flamingly homosexual, and have many female friends with whom to see Matt Damon flicks.
Posted by: Marie on April 24, 2003 10:27 AMThat Matt Damon! Smart enough to write for Gilmore Girls but with the perfect ass requisite in overwrought spy thrillers.
Flaming is wasted on the gay.
Posted by: on April 24, 2003 7:44 PMI hope he poses nude sometime. http://www.achewood.com/04052002.html
So Marie, when are you going to start blogging again? You're such a tease.
Posted by: Lane on April 30, 2003 5:51 PM